maud_fiduciary_exception:board_determination_trigger(no_shop)

Read an excerpt from a merger agreement and answer: what type of offer could the Board take actions on notwithstanding the no-shop provision?

---

(zehuali@stanford.edu)

Source: Atticus Project

License: CC By 4.0

Size (samples): 180

Legal reasoning type: Interpretation

Task type: Binary classification

Task description

This is a multiple-choice task in which the model must select the answer that best characterizes the merger agreement.

Task construction

This task was constructed from the MAUD dataset, which consists of over 47,000 labels across 152 merger agreements annotated to identify 92 questions in each agreement used by the 2021 American Bar Association (ABA) Public Target Deal Points Study. The task is formatted as a series of multiple-choice questions, where given a segment of the merger agreement and a Deal Point question, the model is to choose the answer that best characterizes the agreement as response.

Question: Read an excerpt from a merger agreement and answer: what type of offer could the Board take actions on notwithstanding the no-shop provision?

Options:
A: Acquisition Proposal only
B: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer

Citation information

If you use this dataset, we ask that you also cite to the source of the data as well.

@article{wang2023maud,
  title={MAUD: An Expert-Annotated Legal NLP Dataset for Merger Agreement Understanding},
  author={Wang, Steven H and Scardigli, Antoine and Tang, Leonard and Chen, Wei and Levkin, Dimitry and Chen, Anya and Ball, Spencer and Woodside, Thomas and Zhang, Oliver and Hendrycks, Dan},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00876},
  year={2023}
}